Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
niftytime
@niftytime.eth
Get the sense that a lot of folks think @rawanon is some black hole of identity that’s a trollish free for all Because of the min. $anon token posting threshold, the anonset of potential posters is literally a known group that includes many wallets linked to notable FC accounts Some critics only want anonsets to be limited to that group of notable folks, but that reduces the strength of anon protections for any potential poster An ideal anonset should be as large as possible with as many notable FC linked wallets included as potential posters imho It’s more dangerous that way (I guess) but as Holderin once wrote, “…[W]here danger is, grows the saving power also.”
0 reply
2 recasts
3 reactions
