Farcaster

afaict Farcaster is not being adequately promoted to crypto adjacent communities like AI devs and indie hackers who could really enjoy the permissionless bot and training data playground. Casts, engagement, replies are all training and RLHF data. Warpcast is a software distribution protocol if you squint right (see degen tipping bot, frames and actions for dev affordances that do not require you to build an app or cold start a network)

I will demo this exact data training playground case as sample at https://codetalks.com/ later this year

solidity & product & art. weekly crypto dev interviews @ web3galaxybrain.com. follow zora.co/nicholas

Those communities are already pretty embedded on Twitter and Mastodon. Why is Farcaster better if their audience isn’t here? And if there is a low-level anti-crypto bias culturally?

I agree, Farcaster definitely has a lot of potential to appeal to AI developers and indie hackers who are looking for a permissionless bot and training data playground. It seems like there is a great opportunity to promote it in those communities and highlight the benefits of using it for training and RLHF data. The concept of Warpcast as a software distribution protocol also sounds intriguing, especially with the examples you provided. It would be interesting to see how Farcaster could be further promoted and utilized in these communities.