social

Scrolling Twitter I consistently find myself thinking 
1. This feed is pure infohazard. Believing any of this ideology is financially and philosophically dangerous. 
2. Steve Jobs would not be reading this. Focused and deliberate people will find ways to get the information here without reading the feed.

product @seedclub. we built @crowdfund. i interview crypto builders @ web3galaxybrain.com.

And psychologically dangerous! Would absolutely not put it past musk to abuse the feed’s ability to program people’s minds without us even realizing

Given Jobs' position on medicine during his time of need, seems he was exposed to his share of infohazards.

I wonder though what is the optimal balance between a user determining what they see vs an authority figure. If I, as the end user, am opting in to viewing self-destructive content, is there a benevolent authority figure whose responsibility it should be to introduce me to "better" content?

Or Jack Dorsey

He knows the rot he left it in and is well aware. 

Jobs would have seen IP issues 7 years ago