Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
it should be much easier to document trade calls I make, and those others make, and have the outcomes analyzed by ai with a dexscreener api key. imagine a farcaster or tg dm bot where you paste in natural language calls ie "$... is going to $... with haste" and then with one command you can have it output "that never happened" or "that did work out, but you would have to have sold 4.5 days later during a window of 4 hours" or "if you sold at ... then you missed out on the subsequent 50x which took 2 weeks to manifest" even better it would incorporate public wallet addresses to see if people did what they said, frontran, paperhanded, or held to 0
4 replies
12 recasts
104 reactions
six
@six
happy to be checked on this one in the future buys/holdings are public right around my “balls tingling” cast
2 replies
0 recast
26 reactions
nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
it stuck out to me because it changed my thinking. separately i feel a great informational recency bias about calls/takes, token or otherwise. i'm less focused on public accountability, though ofc that is spicy i'm more interested in just improving my mental model when interpreting and internalizing takes i read and have on my own
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
six
@six
yea i can share my thinking, i originally bought around 1.5 cuz i thought the ticker, lore, and meme were good now around 6 i believe that thesis was validated but there is now additional power around the community forming as well as @anoncast and related developments so i think it goes higher
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
nicholas 🧨
@nicholas
for context on my end, i bought several percent of the token in the first few minutes it was launched. i bought with zeal bc "it's superanon, everyone loves superanon" and i was mostly out of the token by the time the dog drama started around 3.5M. slokh's new anoncast tool is v cool, and vageuly woj approved, but i intuit that superanon is the schelling point for anon posting on fc, and may not be so easily dislodged even by better tech i dont have strong sense how twitter will/wont take to $ANON. given that the account itself is a fc feature, it may make less sense there than lum like the cohort you mention in your cast, i missed lum, though i dont think i even really knew much about it when i was buying gobs of anon.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
