Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

max ↑🎩 pfp
max ↑🎩
@baseddesigner.eth
if we want to regulate crypto, would we want to go the ancient way and write laws on paper? or would we want it to be open, simple - digital and based on smart contracts / code? currently you need lawyers to understand or rather outsource law understanding to them to do pretty much anything with coded law you could just run a query against a token contract or something, same thing dexscreener has with tokensniffer
2 replies
1 recast
9 reactions

max ↑🎩 pfp
max ↑🎩
@baseddesigner.eth
so combining all of the tools like tokensniffer into a single "regulatory" or what we all agree is making sense and integrate into our products to make it safer for people onchain
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

max ↑🎩 pfp
max ↑🎩
@baseddesigner.eth
then if we had law updates done similarly as code updates, which makes a lot of sense if you think about it - github for laws where you can review each line and have multiple stakeholders to approve
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

Nelson M. Rosario pfp
Nelson M. Rosario
@nelsonmrosario
Washington DC started down this path in 2018 and there has been lots of research into making the law programmatic for about 20 years https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2018/11/how-i-changed-the-law-with-a-github-pull-request/
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction