Lulu

@nekofar.eth

290 Following

1497 Followers

Lulu pfp

I've tried once, it didn't pass. But I think is 2 make more sense. Lils are really cheap. Like $70-100. 🤔

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Dan Romero pfp

New: Pinned casts on profiles - To pin a cast, go to your profile and pin from there - 1 cast at a time - Warpcast only for now; if it gets enough usage, will add API / protocol - Live on web and mobile; update to the latest mobile app

53 replies

180 recasts

813 reactions

Lulu pfp

Some proposal states lack transactions and transaction hashes, so there's no need for Etherscan links.

1 reply

0 recast

4 reactions

wylin💎↑ pfp

0 reply

1 recast

3 reactions

Lulu pfp

Just to be clear, even under non-profit status, employees like Verbs should still have a fair salary, but it’s usually set below the industry average. It’s even stricter for founders and their relatives, so let’s drop any old arguments about voting outcomes here. The second you chose DUNA, any notion that votes decide the outcome went out the window. The outcome needs to be compliant and compatible with rules, or there are going to be consequences.

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Lulu pfp

Verbs aren’t founders (just using them as an example to clarify fairness), but we paid them over a million dollars this year. The average protocol developer salary in the U.S. is around $150k, with a range from $100k to $250k, meaning we’ve paid them more than double the top rate. Feel free to check past Nounders proposals and judge for yourself if those payments were fair. When it comes to assigning proper status, there are experts on it.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Lulu pfp

To be clear, under 501(c)(3), founders cannot profit from earnings and may only receive fair salaries. Transactions must be fair, and if dissolved, assets go to another nonprofit, ensuring funds serve the mission.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Lulu pfp

They’re the funders and main holders of Nouns, and that’s exactly how it’s going to look when the time comes, even after the rewards end.

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Lulu pfp

Exactly. We’ve seen plenty of similar props get ignored in the past, but now, with folks actively working toward non-profit and charity status, some pushing these through feels like they’re just throwing up hurdles. Because yes, they can't do what they have done before under that status.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Lulu pfp

Bring out the big guns just to pass a 9 ETH prop? Yeah, that just screams suspicious. Pushing it through feels more like sabotage than support, especially if we’re aiming for official non-profit status. They’re definitely going to be looking at these kinds of moves.

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Lulu pfp

Alright, let’s break it down logically. Why would anyone sell their Nounder Nouns when holding onto them means control over millions? I’m not implying any intentional moves here; I can’t be certain of that, but it’s what’s happening. If you take a closer look at where the spending goes, you’ll see the pattern. Ironically, this kind of management could end up being a major hurdle for achieving real nonprofit status.

0 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Lulu pfp

Well, it seems like some people have gotten used to milking Nouns and just can’t accept that this is supposed to be a nonprofit. They take everything personally right away. 🤷🏻‍♂️

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Lulu pfp

PS: I don’t quite get why you think anyone would be jealous of you, but hey, if you actually want to talk, then talk, don’t just toss out cute little texts and block me. 😂

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Lulu pfp

@supriyo.eth Where exactly did I sound jealous when talking about making this space more competitive? Did you just sidestep that point entirely? Every time I mention client incentives, it’s like clockwork: "Well, others are already getting overpaid, so we’ve got a precedent." And I’m sitting here like, "Sure, that was relevant in the Jurassic era, but now we’ve got actual ways to progress." 😹

1 reply

0 recast

4 reactions

Lulu pfp

One of the funny things about Nouns is how being “Nounish” is supposed to mean doing good without expecting anything in return. But if you look closer, it’s like a Where’s Waldo trying to spot a Nounder who’s actually done anything unpaid. These folks are stacking up Nouns, cashing checks, and leading some of the biggest spending sprees around here. And now, the plan is to go non-profit, or as some clever souls are calling it, noun-profit. Get amusing by this show, it’s redefining “charity work,” huh? Sorry for not being Nounish enough to keep this talk behind closed doors. 😹

2 replies

0 recast

6 reactions

Lulu pfp

Wondering how many gifts we should toss at their aligned friends for a product nobody even touches 🎁😂. What’s next? Asking us to cover their taxes too, like some of our other “generous” pals?

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Lulu pfp

When it comes to “aligned friends” they’re rolling out the red carpet and firing up the big guns 🔫 but somehow still forgot to mention that Noun 456 was gifted for contributions, including Nouns Terminal. Classic 😂

1 reply

0 recast

0 reaction

Lulu pfp

@seneca just flexing to show who's got the final word. Cool, we see it. 😂 Although, some of us aren't exactly quaking in our boots. ✌️👀

1 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

Lulu pfp

Getting closer to feeling like a corporation run by board members, while the rest of us are just small shareholders. For now, we still have a voice, but who knows about the future. I've seen some wild ideas floating around; like muting voters.

1 reply

2 recasts

4 reactions

Lulu pfp

For those not familiar with the concept of Client Incentives, check out this article by Verbs on how it all works and how you can get involved: https://mirror.xyz/verbsteam.eth/I5KgKbcJBjROn4KR_Ks9VcAuQXYUUHwkzGiX0gFbtME

0 reply

0 recast

4 reactions