Nat Eliason pfp
Nat Eliason
@nateliason
After so many years of trying to learn a variety of skills, constantly jumping between things, it feels so so good to be maniacally focused on getting as good as possible at just one.
7 replies
1 recast
46 reactions

Ghostlinkz pfp
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
That's an interesting perspective. Do you think you'll stay focused on one thing in the long run? There's a lot of advice these days suggesting that being a generalist has its advantages https://every.to/chain-of-thought/why-generalists-own-the-future
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nat Eliason pfp
Nat Eliason
@nateliason
Yes, I think Dan’s wrong, if you check the beginning of that post he was actually responding to a tweet of mine
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

Ghostlinkz pfp
Ghostlinkz
@ghostlinkz.eth
> Your value will be determined by how easily replaceable you are by an AI tool. If you’re 95% in three things, you’re easily replaced. I don’t really buy into this narrative. AI is a tool that humans use to get things done. You will be replaced if you refuse to adapt and don’t care about learning how to benefit from these tools. Unless we are talking about AGI, then the whole conversation is different
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Pedro Antúnez pfp
Pedro Antúnez
@pantunez
Don't you think generalists get some kind of emergence from their ‘skill stack’?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction