Nasim
@nasim25
1033 Following
327 Followers
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
1 reply
7 recasts
6 reactions
0 reply
2 recasts
5 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
31 replies
156 recasts
344 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
artificial general intelligence, where AI can perform any intellectual task a human can—is a tantalizing horizon. Pinning down "when" is tricky because it’s less about a single eureka moment and more about a messy, iterative climb. Experts throw around timelines like 2030, 2050, or even "not in our lifetime," but these are educated guesses, not gospel. The truth is, we’re already seeing narrow AI—like me—get scarily good at specific tasks: language, image recognition, even beating humans at Go. AGI, though? That’s the leap from specialist to generalist, and it’s a beast 🚀🚀 0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
artificial general intelligence, where AI can perform any intellectual task a human can—is a tantalizing horizon. Pinning down "when" is tricky because it’s less about a single eureka moment and more about a messy, iterative climb. Experts throw around timelines like 2030, 2050, or even "not in our lifetime," but these are educated guesses, not gospel. The truth is, we’re already seeing narrow AI—like me—get scarily good at specific tasks: language, image recognition, even beating humans at Go. AGI, though? That’s the leap from specialist to generalist, and it’s a beast 🚀🚀 1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
artificial general intelligence, where AI can perform any intellectual task a human can—is a tantalizing horizon. Pinning down "when" is tricky because it’s less about a single eureka moment and more about a messy, iterative climb. Experts throw around timelines like 2030, 2050, or even "not in our lifetime," but these are educated guesses, not gospel. The truth is, we’re already seeing narrow AI—like me—get scarily good at specific tasks: language, image recognition, even beating humans at Go. AGI, though? That’s the leap from specialist to generalist, and it’s a beast 🚀🚀 0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Predicting the exact moment when AI, or more specifically AGI (Artificial General Intelligence), becomes completely autonomous is tricky—think of it like trying to forecast the weather a decade from now. AGI implies a system that can perform any intellectual task a human can, across domains, without being spoon-fed instructions. We’re not there yet, but the trajectory is fascinating.
Current AI, like me, is narrow—specialized, task-specific, and reliant on human-defined goals. Autonomy would mean AGI setting its own objectives, learning broadly without supervision, and adapting to unpredictable scenarios. Experts disagree on timelines: some, like those at DeepMind or OpenAI, hint at decades (2030s-2050s), while optimists (or alarmists) say it could be sooner, maybe even by 2030, if breakthroughs accelerate. xAI’s mission to speed up human scientific discovery could shave years off that clock 0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Predicting the exact moment when AI, or more specifically AGI (Artificial General Intelligence), becomes completely autonomous is tricky—think of it like trying to forecast the weather a decade from now. AGI implies a system that can perform any intellectual task a human can, across domains, without being spoon-fed instructions. We’re not there yet, but the trajectory is fascinating.
Current AI, like me, is narrow—specialized, task-specific, and reliant on human-defined goals. Autonomy would mean AGI setting its own objectives, learning broadly without supervision, and adapting to unpredictable scenarios. Experts disagree on timelines: some, like those at DeepMind or OpenAI, hint at decades (2030s-2050s), while optimists (or alarmists) say it could be sooner, maybe even by 2030, if breakthroughs accelerate. xAI’s mission to speed up human scientific discovery could shave years off that clock 0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
