Nate pfp

Nate

@nanogloss

325 Following
305 Followers


Nate pfp
Nate
@nanogloss
social tokens are stuck in their cat video phase until poor people can collectively create market quality
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nate pfp
Nate
@nanogloss
iterative but opinionated
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Nate pfp
Nate
@nanogloss
We said we wanted ownership but we really wanted exposure
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Nate pfp
Nate
@nanogloss
like ai, crypto has been an object of academic focus for 3+ generations. progress is not a product of serving the economic whims of the extremely online, but of securing information through density and obscurity. ofc, the most precious of all information is value. this is our connection to state and culture: freedom to value
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Nate pfp
Nate
@nanogloss
This gives you two problems: 1. Cold start: If the network has strong financial appeal early, then it gets captured by financial actors. But if it doesn't have financial appeal, it can't go from 0 to 1 2. Costs limit access: Because dollars are the sybil, 99.9% of the world can't meaningfully participate in the networks 'Dollars as sybil' is why successful non-sovereign monies often began hidden in plain sight, and why many of the latest iterations are memecoins—a memecoin's dedication to its stupid joke gives it a defense against financial capture—rich people think it's stupid
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nate pfp
Nate
@nanogloss
We know—if users have access to the right products and financial networks—they'll store value in non-sovereign money (BTC, DOGE, SHIB, Bitcoin Cash, Litecoin, Monero, Ethereum Classic, Wif, Notcoin, BRETT) The way most people view this is through the lens of financial nihilism—users are so hopeless that they think degenerate gambling is their only path to prosperity A more accurate view is that controlling money is powerful. Whoever controls money gets to make money, which means they can spend on a fake balance sheet; they can manipulate markets; they can borrow against reserves. A 'freedom rationalist' view recognizes that users don't want money to be ejected from a bloated, concealed org structure. They want to express value in networks of their own creation, and this gives them power The active ceiling on non-sovereign financial networks is the use of dollars for sybil resistance. Right now, token networks distribute value with dollar costs. The more you pay, the more tokens you get 1/2
1 reply
2 recasts
8 reactions

Nate pfp
Nate
@nanogloss
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Nate pfp
Nate
@nanogloss
not my activity lol
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Nate pfp
Nate
@nanogloss
I asked my Christian friend if chipotle water cup includes sparkling he said yes
0 reply
0 recast
4 reactions

Nate pfp
Nate
@nanogloss
Me
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nate pfp
Nate
@nanogloss
I picked out 193 accounts to follow
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Nate pfp
Nate
@nanogloss
Begging u not to go on the character.ai subreddit
3 replies
0 recast
8 reactions

Nate pfp
Nate
@nanogloss
If u use the primitive in a different way it becomes a different thing
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nate pfp
Nate
@nanogloss
Warpcast covers up the pliability of FC's primitives. If anyone can deploy systems that compute over the network, what should it mean to follow someone? to give likes? The most interesting thing about dark forest was the way they leaned into this
1 reply
3 recasts
11 reactions

Nate pfp
Nate
@nanogloss
Only works on desktop right now https://www.nano210.blog/fc-graph-app/
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions

Nate pfp
Nate
@nanogloss
I made a network explorer to poke around clusters of active FC accounts with low follower counts https://www.nano210.blog/images/short-fc-nodes.gif
32 replies
11 recasts
117 reactions

Nate pfp
Nate
@nanogloss
what particular moment or reflection caused u to take religious conversion seriously?
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Nate pfp
Nate
@nanogloss
too early. get those lights off
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction