anon pfp
anon
@superanon
disagree, it's just a vampire attack in both cases. possibly very worse, to different institutions. integrity is realizing any "memeing a cast with a clanker" is deliberate repackaging of someone else's expression as something that trades. any absence of consent, much less financial license, is super sus and scammy. possibly predatory, to different institutions. let's "double-click on this" in a couple of years to check if there was any sustainability.
4 replies
38 recasts
182 reactions

Matthew pfp
Matthew
@matthew
ehh i get the point but i disagree. by the same logic remixes would be entirely theft and don’t think that’s fair. that said if you quote or reply and launch a clanker, i do think fees should be auto split between you and the OP.
1 reply
12 recasts
121 reactions

namdinh pfp
namdinh
@namdinh
haha
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction