Farcaster

What if we implement a formula like this?

I’ve put a lot of thought into designing a formula that evaluates multiple sources and then reaches a balanced conclusion. The idea is that if one source is inaccurate or biased, the others should help correct the final outcome.

This approach considers three key inputs:

1️⃣ WC Spam Label – Detects the likelihood of spammy behavior.
2️⃣ OpenRank – Measures engagement and following credibility.
3️⃣ Neynar Score – Evaluates overall user quality based on interactions.

By combining these sources mathematically, we get an objective and transparent way to classify users. The output so far looks promising—it provides clear differentiation between trusted users, suspicious accounts, and spammers.

What do you think? Would this model make trust scoring more fair and convincing for everyone?

I guess you could add the social score from Moxie as well (without the boost from creator token locks)
I think that weights heavy on active followers

hamst.art $hamster /hamster 
martinvr.eth 
deploy.degen.eth

The original one which they still have in their responses is without token dependency

I couldn't find a formula for it! I was thinking about that, but airstack determines rankings based on token dependency.