Content pfp
Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/ryan
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Schmidtiest.eth 🎩 pfp
Schmidtiest.eth 🎩
@schmidtiest.eth
Working on something...
2 replies
1 recast
7 reactions

The Dude Bart🐘🌳 βŒβ—¨-β—¨ pfp
The Dude Bart🐘🌳 βŒβ—¨-β—¨
@thedude
figuring out spam labels?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Schmidtiest.eth 🎩 pfp
Schmidtiest.eth 🎩
@schmidtiest.eth
So basically yes, except i’m more focused on why the algo is excluding fids. if you look at the bottom of the image, you can see the number of lines (>200,000). If you look on the right side of every line of text you’ll see the date of last review . I removed all fids that had been reviewed in the last month, and the rest haven’t been β€œseen” by the spam algo in over a month, some much longer ago. Google says Warpcast has 828,000 users, if so then ~1/4 of them seem to have been skipped by the algo.
3 replies
1 recast
2 reactions

PermaNoob 🎩 πŸ–πŸŒ­ pfp
PermaNoob 🎩 πŸ–πŸŒ­
@strangesmell
Could be they are excluding review of fid groups based on labels like "power user" or "active user" or... ? Not sure but maybe @pichi or @mvr has some thoughts?
3 replies
0 recast
2 reactions

mvr 🐹 pfp
mvr 🐹
@mvr
I do btw think they do have some manual spam labels (from like reports). Which only update again after human intervention
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Schmidtiest.eth 🎩 pfp
Schmidtiest.eth 🎩
@schmidtiest.eth
πŸ€” people sometimes forget things though- automating a reminder to review those requiring human intervention, feels too simple?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

mvr 🐹 pfp
mvr 🐹
@mvr
Sounds like a great plan but I guess the list is huge
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions