Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

matteo pfp
matteo
@mtteo
multiple papers about verifying edits on an image with zk-snarks recently: - VerITAS: Verifying Image Transformations at Scale: using lattice based hash+poseidon alongside Plonky2 - VIMz: Verifiable Image Manipulation using Folding-based zkSNARKs: using Nova I think we're still not there for something practical, but it's super cool to see ZK used outside of blockchains
2 replies
2 recasts
16 reactions

avi pfp
avi
@avichalp
could you elaborate on why proving image transformation is not practical yet?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

matteo pfp
matteo
@mtteo
Why I said that is because as far as I understand is that the setup/proving time would 2 to 6 minutes _per edit_ (verifier time is super fast tho) I think VerITAS actually claims it's already practical, because it's been created with news organizations in mind, so they could take the time to prove their edits, which is fair Maybe I was wrong :D
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

matteo pfp
matteo
@mtteo
Also, I'm not sure, but I guess that for proving the transformations, you need to use a specific software to do these edits? which seems a bit unpractical for me so far, but that would be fun to integrate it to already existing OSS for edits
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction