Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
27 recasts
29 reactions

GIGAMΞSH pfp
GIGAMΞSH
@gigamesh
The market doesn’t seem to accept OP is Base’s token. When Jesse was on Bloomberg recently, even Mike Novogratz asked multiple times when Base will launch a token. Are people just cynical about the relationship between Base <> Optimism? What am I missing? https://www.bloomberg.com/news/videos/2024-06-04/next-gen-of-internet-is-on-base-coinbase-s-pollak-video
10 replies
7 recasts
123 reactions

Ryan Wyatt pfp
Ryan Wyatt
@fwiz
Personally, I think @jessepollak has been a great advocate for the Superchain. I'll always want them to talk more about Optimism, but Base has an ecosystem to build, and plugging the infrastructure all the time doesn't make sense. Here's how I see it: this is on the Optimism Collective to solve. * Shift the narrative from "Optimism = OP Mainnet" to "Optimism = the Superchain" * Drive "Built on the Superchain" branding across OP Stack chains * Drive product clarity through educational campaigns and visual storytelling * Ship interoperability (native OP token across Base, Mode, etc.) * Keep getting large ecosystem chains to build on OP Stack, contribute revenue, and join the Superchain * Make sure people know Base, Mode, Zora, World Chain, and all Superchains are contributing 15% of their sequencer fees to the Optimism Collective. * Let Grants Council cook and build and invest in the future of OP mainnet If we solve this, the story will tell itself and won't need to be authored by Base or Optimism.
7 replies
5 recasts
37 reactions

MLow 🌸 pfp
MLow 🌸
@mlow
What do you see as the objective of holding op tokens now that fees are significantly lower
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction