Had a call with an industry titan in product management yesterday.

He asked me in which ways web3 social can be:
Cheaper, Faster or Better than web2 social?

I had an answer that I thought was compelling, but his follow up questions were challenging.
I'd be (genuinely) curious of what you think is the strongest answer

Building Larry, FOSS via @frames, @framesfun /open-frames to help decentralized social win. a16z CSX23. farcasterchannels.com farcaster.id

For me the answer lies in limitless possibilities for integration and customization

building social platform // lost in communication guy // web3 and startups // master of dreaming

1. How does this make the experience cheaper, faster or better for the average mass consumer user? 

2. If there was a big enough market for this, why doesn't twitter or another web2 service allow this?

1. You can manage your social activity much more easily. The ux can be taken to a new level thanks to unlimited customization. Monopoly will disappear and the profits will be distributed among small developers.

2. Because top players are not interested in sharing their market with others. 

Just my thoughts