Humpy's (ongoing/alleged) governance capture of #comp is different than it was for 

Balancer / SushiSwap. Lending protocol governance capture has many more avenues for a catastrophic outcome for protocol *users* than an amm protocol, especially unintentional ones.

Forged by the trenches, ex fund manager, 2 exits • Curating /shroomiez /911

I dont completely buy that argument that this was all about fee capture. Do you think if comp distributed 50% of all profits to comp holders this would be less likely to happen? why?

This one was actually good (for Comp holders and the greater DeFi space imho).

Founders/delegates/whoever has effective protocol control should be pushed into activating fee distribution if the project is ready for it. Most DeFi behemoth dapps are past ready.