Matthew
@matthew
RE all the @purple drama, I do think there could be more clear guidelines on mission, criteria for funding, how to propose, etc... What if we all got on a call and talked through it together? and maybe have a doc open to collab on. Once we have something we like, we make a proposal to the DAO to codify it on-chain.
8 replies
0 recast
10 reactions
Matthew
@matthew
also sorry @cameron I know you just posted something but the thought popped into my head reading
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
I’ve been asking for a purple touchpoint rhythm for a while 🫡 Communities build identity and clarify values through engaging with each other - synchronous comms speed that process up a LOT (and FarCon will too) Whatever the people I want, I want us to do.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
billzh.eth 🎩
@billzh
all casts are async no? I don't think sync comm works for 160+ holders
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
Perma-sync comms def don’t work for big groups. Regular sprints of sync comms absolutely work. A monthly zoom call, a quarterly forum, etc Honestly the most boomer thing about me (besides my cringe modernism) is that I firmly believe in a face to face conversation to discuss hard or complex things.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
billzh.eth 🎩
@billzh
I love f2f, but do you have one example of sync comms working for a large decentralized org?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Matthew
@matthew
id argue AA is pretty close https://www.aa.org/international-convention
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
