Matthew
@matthew
last chance to sign up for a @coffeebot chat this week! Drop your telegram at the cast below to join 😃☕️ farcaster://casts/0x9661add1165bd8a6978f01f48262db62ab0de82529939325cf306c8562c7b6bf/0x9661add1165bd8a6978f01f48262db62ab0de82529939325cf306c8562c7b6bf
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Daniel Svonava
@svonava
Hey @matthew, want to take @coffeebot up a notch and match people smartly based on what they do on the app? Ain’t nobody got time for random intros! (most churn after 2-3 random matches, this is what killed lunchclub.com - their matches were bad + the avg user quality went down).
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Matthew
@matthew
what would you want to see beyond random matches? @ishika and i have talked about making it more personalized! re lunchclub, i think what killed them is that people don’t want to pay for things they think they can get for free— e.g. intros to new friends. Also, the pandemic. And raising as an “AI” company.
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Graham Siener
@gsiener
I’d be interested in something like a lean coffee where a group of folks hop into a zoom to discuss a bunch of topics in a given space. For me, that’d feel more approachable than a 1:1
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Gregory F.
@gf
My friends are making thebreakfast.app and spent a lot of time thinking about matching. Initially they did it like so: placed people in buckets semi-manually based on profile review, then made a matrix of probabilities of matching between buckets (e.g. A-A: 40%, A-B: 20%, A-C: 10%, ...). Had pretty good results
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Daniel Svonava
@svonava
It’s very hard to scale a social experience without making the discovery actually smart - matching more senior people with other more senior people, matching people with a higher chance to collaborate or enjoy each other because of enough similarity in preferences, yet not totally the same.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
