Purple is a DAO whose goal is to proliferate and expand the Farcaster protocol and ecosystem. 

https://purple.construction/

Disappointed to see someone who *received funding from @purple* vote against our BuilderDAO proposal.

It's apparently "unsustainable" for Purple, one of the most active supporters of the ecosystem, to get funding to keep doing so, but not for this person ask the same DAO to fund their own personal projects.

design @splits | /latenightcrew /event-pass /feud

I don't enjoy speaking out about stuff like this because I believe everyone here wants to see this ecosystem flourish, but it feels awfully hypocritical.

Head of Engineering @ Bitwise | Arsenal fan, cyclist, poker enthusiast | @purple #143 🟪 

It's here: https://www.alphacaster.xyz/dao/builder-3tfkzl0na9/vote/44

I understand the worry, BuilderDAO can't just give out 50 ETH anytime someone asks. I still disagree, but I see the point.

What disappoints me is that they say this having just received significant funding from Purple for their own project.

What was the rationale for vote AGAINST? 

I'm not disagreeing with you, but you can imagine a reason why someone would ask for support from @purple but not vote FOR the prop. Let's say they thought 50 ETH is too high. Anyway, curious if there was a rationale.