Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

kenny 🎩 pfp
kenny 🎩
@kenny
for anyone curious this is the reason we can't have a chronological feed (even though 90%+ of users want one) Warpcast team doesn't see that the quality of the algo feed is downstream of having the basics right (chronological feed ensures good visibility for new posts early on, boosting quality of discussion) so instead they try to tweak an algo that isn't being fed good enough content in the first place
10 replies
2 recasts
30 reactions

MattwithouttheT 🎩 pfp
MattwithouttheT 🎩
@mathew
I don’t understand such a hard stance. Can’t a simple toggle be added?
3 replies
0 recast
6 reactions

kenny 🎩 pfp
kenny 🎩
@kenny
he says it's a product philosophy thing, as in if they add it, they are taking their eye off the ball of crafting the perfect algo crafting the perfect algo is super easy tho, surely it will be done any day now
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions

MattwithouttheT 🎩 pfp
MattwithouttheT 🎩
@mathew
I still don’t understand how offering a chronological OPTION diminishes the team’s ability to work on creating their version of the perfect algo. Keep fighting the good fight ✊🏻
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

stellabelle🎩 pfp
stellabelle🎩
@stellabelle
none of understand. Bluesky had this chronological choice from the beginning and it’s not a big deal. User choice of algo is the default there. i don’t get why dwr is such a dictator
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction