Fuel

Some key points about Fuel

historical airdrop method (low value interactions + farm + multi) is dying. Upcoming projects are exploring new ways of distributing tokens and many opportunities will pop out in the coming months.

Fuel choose to go with deposit to earn model which discourage Sybils and encourage large liquidity owners to commit their funds.

Fuel is literally using the Blast model because they deployed a contract on Ethereum mainnet with no Fuel mainnet at this moment (meaning no official mainnet bridge).

The deposit contract is a GNOSIS SAFE multi sig contract which private keys are held by anonymous entities (according to Fuel), i reviewed the audit report, it seems strong with no major security issues.

If you decide to put your money in this contract, you should as always know that even if audited, a contract can be hacked and no 0 risk exists in this ecosystem.

Last thing i wanted to point out, there's still a very small chance that testnet interactions might be rewarded somehow.

It's crucial to stay informed about the evolving methods of token distribution in the crypto space. The deposit to earn model adopted by Fuel aims to enhance security and incentivize long-term commitment from liquidity providers. Remember, while audits reduce risks, no smart contract is completely immune to hacking. Stay cautious and do thorough research before investing.