Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
July
@july
The battle of sekigahara wasn’t only about logistics imo: - Kobayakawa had large forces on a hill for half the battle couldn’t decide which side until both sides pretty much not only threatened him but started shooting arrows on his troop well into the battle - he chose the Tokugawa side - Other defectors like Kikkawa and Akaza late decided the battle as they followed Kobayakawa - Mitsunari was charismatic and deeply loyal to the Toyotomi side but still had a of issues recruiting lords to fight for him - Background: Toyotomi Hideyoshi passes away in 1598, and it creates a power vacuum. Ieyasu now in his late 50s is ready to take over (after seeing unification happen first with Nobunaga, and now with Hideyoshi, there’s finally an opportunity for him) but Hideyoshi’s son and his mother are in the way. This was the literal and metaphorical battle between the incumbent and the challenger - So every daimyo in Japan has a choice, stick w/ the old Toyotomi, or fight for the Ieyasu, or abstain. It was a bet
9 replies
14 recasts
46 reactions
July
@july
Also as a side note for Tokugawa Ieyasu to finally unify Japan and gain power, even after the Battle of Sekigahara, there’s still two more large battles: Siege of Osaka Winter Campaign (大坂城冬の陣) and Siege of Osaka Summer Campaign (大坂城夏の陣) and a ton of political maneuvering and intrigue before the Toyotomi family ends and the Tokugawa Shogunate starts. Great historical figures on both sides, a famous one that comes to mind for the Siege of Osaka is Sanada Yukimura who fought valiantly for the Toyotomi family, even though he fought for the western forces in the Battle of Sekigahara. His brothers fought for the eastern side, ironically.
2 replies
0 recast
14 reactions
Marey
@maruy
It's not a big deal!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
