Warpcast, a decentralized social media platform built on the Farcaster protocol, has some notable limitations:
	1.	Centralized Tendencies
Although Warpcast is based on a decentralized protocol, key features like username management and the allocation of activity badges (power badges) are still controlled by the official team. This centralization has drawn criticism, particularly from non-English-speaking users.
	2.	Limited Support for International Users
Warpcast’s primary focus is on English-speaking communities, and the development team has stated that they do not prioritize support for non-English speakers. This creates a barrier for international users and hampers its global appeal.

3.	Storage and Cost Issues
Users are required to pay for storage units, and failing to renew these units could lead to the deletion of content. This model might deter users who prefer free content publishing and storage options.
	4.	Narrow Ecosystem
The platform’s user base is largely centered around the Web3 and crypto communities, which limits the diversity of topics and discussions. This could be a drawback for those seeking broader interests.