Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
dialethia 🍖🎩
@dialethia.eth
For people considering voting for Trump: Why do you think Trump should be returned to power to represent America and its ideals? Consider the following: Trump was found liable for sexually abusing the columnist E. Jean Carroll. Trump was just convicted on 34 counts for fraud. You can disagree with legal maneuver to escalate to a felony but it doesn't make him any less guilty. Trump took confidential documents and refused to give them back... an open and shut case of Trump's pathological deceit and corruption. A Trump appointed judge has dismissed the case to the outrage legal scholars and precedent providing a clear example of the decay towards Authoritarianism Trump and those he installs to power represent. Trump tried to use fake electors to overturn the 2020 election, refused to concede, continued to push the lie that the election was stolen when it was he who was actually trying to steal it which ultimately lead to the violence of January 6th. There’s more but let’s just start with that.
19 replies
0 recast
20 reactions
Manator.eth 🎩🍖💊🍓
@manator
Now compare this with the alleviations against Joe Biden and his son Hunter, those are political attacks by opponents not proper legal actions. Double standards!
5 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Aunt Homie
@infinitehomie
1. Trump was found liable. 2. Other actions, he was convicted 3. As of two days ago, Biden isn’t running 😂
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Manator.eth 🎩🍖💊🍓
@manator
Cool story bro, Democrats aligned judge openly being biased against Trump convicted him… awesome, not saying he is not, but the justice system in the US is broken and politicalized. How is the fact that Biden is not running anymore changing the fact that your applying double standards?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
dialethia 🍖🎩
@dialethia.eth
I am not sure what conviction you are talking about but the recent conviction for falsifying business records in NY, the sexual assault trial were both jury trials. He was convicted based on the facts of the case by "a jury of his peers" aka the people. The earlier civil fraud conviction against the Trump Organization was a bench trial decided by a judge as they never asked for a jury. It was an open and shut case not about whether the fraud occurred as that was indisputable, what was being determined was the penalty (how much $$ Trump Org was liable for due to their fraud). Corruption in the judiciary is definitely on display. Aileen Cannon's handling of the classified documents case has been disturbing from the beginning. Her most recent dismissal was widely criticized by legal scholars and was leaning heavily on a recent concurring opinion from Clarence Thomas, a Supreme Court Justice under intense scrutiny for lapses of judicial ethics. The case has been appealed.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Aunt Homie
@infinitehomie
Because there’s a difference in the situation. Take note. Both of them are not good. Not at all. But you don’t know if the same would have happened if they brought a case to Biden. It’s been publicized for years, with trump. Right? Do you know if the same wouldn’t have happened to Biden? No. That’s the issue here. And, trump is running. Biden isn’t running. In this sense, it makes a difference.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
