M4ximum22
@m4ximum22
139 Following
218 Followers
0 reply
11 recasts
69 reactions
0 reply
2 recasts
5 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
1 recast
8 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
1 recast
18 reactions
0 reply
4 recasts
21 reactions
0 reply
1 recast
12 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
If we decided on using client incentives, we should at least stay consistent with it. The only stat that really matters here is whether anyone is actually using the client, and that comes from onchain client incentive records, which I don’t see mentioned in this proposal. If no one’s using Nouns Terminal, what’s the point of funding it further? And if they are using it enough, aren’t the current rewards doing the job? If they’re not, shouldn’t we be looking to increase the incentives instead of just reverting back? We put nearly a million into Verbs this year, and as far as I know, the only thing they’ve fully delivered is client incentives, which, if this is the outcome, seem pointless. 3 replies
5 recasts
17 reactions
3 replies
3 recasts
34 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
2 recasts
16 reactions
0 reply
2 recasts
17 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction