Ethereum

am i crazy or is this whole l1 / l2 debate a completely algorithmically-enabled non-debate?

maybe it's a dissonance from the lag from the developer subculture around DeFi, and the broader reinforcement of incentivized network security.

"regen" might have been too broad a placeholder, so now the conversation is evolving into demand-side policy/mechanics.

still think that any abstracted body displaced by a bridge should also be a keeper and AMO on L1 with ETH, as gwei allows for it. if Spurious Dragon gets lifted, there's obviously more permutations of agency on L2 that can drive L1. atm, the activity is insufficient for stable consensus, barring speculative onramping from central bank policy. I don't like SaaS revenue multiples, that's a recipe for downside correction when we should have it the least.