Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Checking in post permissionless 1. What’s going well? 2. What’s not going well? 3. If you were in charge, what would you be doing differently? To worry about being nice, just honest. Reply here or send me a direct cast on Warpcast or: dwromero.telegram dwr.twitter
22 replies
38 recasts
88 reactions

π’‚ _𒍣𒅀_π’Š‘ pfp
π’‚ _𒍣𒅀_π’Š‘
@m-j-r
1. no stampede moment, FIPs look smooth 2. throughput/distribution is okay, wondering how fcaster formalizes collaborative documents & deeper media (e.g. timestamps on videos) 3. figure out groupchat (even if visible to all hubs) on opencast, also figure out how to extend onchain signers to decentralized compute.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
2. Not sure I understand. Expand or link to something that explains the issue?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

π’‚ _𒍣𒅀_π’Š‘ pfp
π’‚ _𒍣𒅀_π’Š‘
@m-j-r
re: https://warpcast.com/0xen/0xffd3cf80 or links -> YT clips/notion/miro just feels like too much dependence on externally, revocably supplied schema, not enough of farcaster itself handling data via IPFS/Arweave -> us linking to FIP-2-adjacent schema on traditional web2. should be quality from critics & diffs, imho.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

π’‚ _𒍣𒅀_π’Š‘ pfp
π’‚ _𒍣𒅀_π’Š‘
@m-j-r
in other words, it would be cool to see clients standardize longform documents (e.g. smtp)for collab, specific sections/segments of media files for commentary (which ngl is already mostly solved by FIP-2), native git, etc. tbf, what I'm suggesting is nontrivial & perhaps not the best idea, but I don't want X/bsky/meta
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction