We like to think of technology can be bad or evil, or something that needs to be reigned in or controlled. 

But it is us, who can be evil and bad, technology is itself still a tool and we are the ones that wield it - so what do we do?

creating and destroying; built flying cars & autonomous vehicles, now building /faust, more here: /july, web: july.rocks

there's an existential dilemma here, if we build technology that has a greater span of ethical considerations than humans have the bandwidth for, eventually we're dependent on technology that should have, by demonstrable ethics, more agency than humans. then it wields us for the least harm.

I'm online sometimes

https://bento.me/m-j-r

I think most technology is developed by capital constraints, which don't have the need nor incentive to internalize ethical considerations, likewise political cycles don't have the ability nor reinforcement to internalize ethical considerations. should we further develop ethically credibly neutral contracts & agents...

I’m not 100% sure what you mean here but I do agree it is an existential dilemma of sorts