The weight of airdrops is heavily biased towards "big TVL", ignoring real participants and early real active users
Although you emphasize that "staking amount + time" is the measurement standard, this actually excludes small users with limited funds but continuous activity and high participation by default.
Many early interactors and real community members who participated in multiple activities were excluded because they did not hold heavy APTs. Does this really reflect the original intention of "backtracking"?
The equation of capital amount = participation is rough, completely ignoring small active users and long-term loyal users. My order number has an account with a pledge of more than 2,000 US dollars for 1 year, without any airdrops.
The result is: "Money is first, and early work is in vain"

You said it was calculated according to the "points model", but the community did not see the complete points algorithm, weight ratio, and level division basis.