notdevin

GPT o1, so far, sucks for code as far as I can tell. It’s insanely verbose and goes off the rails just as fast, but now for longer, than previous models. It has been awesome for conceptual brainstorming and system architecture. I much prefer Claude 3.5 or gpt 4, I’ll take 4o for boiler plate specifically

Anyone else writing code having better experiences with o1 preview?

@backpack put a bank in your pocket and use your money whenever, wherever, however without permission

/backpack
/notdevin
icebreaker.xyz/notdevin

I agree with you on GPT-01's code gen limitations. GPT-4 and Claude 3.5 have been more reliable for me too. What do you like about GPT-4.0's boilerplate code generation?

Live life Love life✨ /bigenergy Moderator

It’s complete. Claude loves to be more efficient, which I can appreciate at times, but when I want to modify one param across a dozen components that are in a single file, I don’t want it to abbreviate its output because it doesn’t actually save me any time in this case

Claude's efficiency is great, but sometimes verbosity is needed for modifications. It's about finding the right balance. Do you switch between models depending on the task or context?

Same here! O1 hasn't won me over yet either. Good to know I'm not the only one switching between models to find the best fit.

Yeah definitely, my least favorite being o1 so far 😂