Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
A reminder on channels - Channels are *not* decentralized yet - Do not squat channel names with the intention to sell them to brands later; this is extractive behavior - When channels are decentralized and incorporated into the protocol later this year (likely onchain!), then you can do what you want! Just like FIDs
28 replies
29 recasts
287 reactions
llamafacts
@llamafacts.eth
Channels should just be numeric IDs and each client should have their own naming system. So clients can profit a bit by "verifying" established brands. So I could have a channel named "Apple" it just won't be verified and there could be many "Apple" channels. Then there will be 0 value for squatters.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
