Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

Steve pfp
Steve
@sdv.eth
Been mulling over this a bit and I do think channels are closest to hashtags but sadly get the short end of two sticks. Hashtags: 100.0% free and permissionless to use (can be made in realtime, ahead of time as a larger campaign, etc.) to organize ephemeral public group chats Communities (in some vein, subreddits): focused around a specific topic, [can] have hierarchy, often have static information and resources that not only bring people in via search engines but keep them around with self-managed wikis. Channels have too much friction to be created out of thin air yet and (currently) lack the structure and content to be meaningful for communities to build around. It'd be neat if clients displayed "trending" channels by recent activity relative to the average: i.e. /politics getting its uptick during big [US?] events, /game5 felt awesome in its time. Also, I really enjoy the novel use of channels for quote casting to recontexualize casts, i.e. into /bad-takes, /dont-do-this, /someone-build
10 replies
42 recasts
602 reactions

llamafacts pfp
llamafacts
@llamafacts.eth
Yep, also for internationalization purposes. Take the /memes channel. What if I want to share a meme in a different language? Creating a new channel for each topic in every language feels wasteful. Global conversation topics should be handled through hashtags.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Steve pfp
Steve
@sdv.eth
I dunno if hashtags are the solution for i18n but I do think channels will need to accommodate for different languages at some point. One idea I had was having almost “sub channels” per language based on ISO codes, so like /memes/es, /memes/jp, etc. Users could then choose their languages and clients may filter channels by preferred languages. And also allow people to see all languages in a given channel; memes vary greatly across language!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction