Here's the interview with David Sacks that the taken out of context snippet from the comment below is from: https://youtu.be/RBoGJlpSdpY?t=5866 (starts around 1:37:30). Pretty eye opening stuff tbh, seems to me like Sacks doesn't really know his shit, makes claims like "Bitcoin is the only crypto that doesn't have an 'issuer'" and other weird nonsense. He clearly has been fed the bitcoiner kool aid a lot.

Other take aways, he cleared up the separation between:

Bitcoin in the reserve, never meant to be sold. Additional Bitcoin can potentially be aquired "budget neutral" - I assume this means alchemy or magic.*

The Digital asset stockpile, subject to "portfolio management". Can be sold at the discretion of the secretary of the treasury.