Varun Srinivasan pfp
Varun Srinivasan
@v
Problems with decentralizing the Farcaster follow graph (and a few solutions): https://hackmd.io/@farcasterxyz/HkcscxJ8i
7 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Ghees pfp
Ghees
@gheescaster
farcaster://casts/0x...f4bb0a70ce Was asking this question elsewhere. I think you have to force people to publish follow graphs. I would rather err on the side of a weak signal (like a follow for a user preference) than having no signal at all. Not having the incentive to do so…will create client lock in…
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

LIL INTERNET pfp
LIL INTERNET
@lil
Additionally, and this is a big, initial "physics" change, but I think *following others* should be forced into "lists" rather than one pool. It's fine right now, but with scale, follows in one pool become more and more noisy, which makes recommendation algos more necessary, which ends up with nth order issues.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction