Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
lex anastasia
@lexanastasia
first things first: the SEC's claim that the wallet acts as an unregistered broker has been dismissed this means that while the lawsuit against Coinbase can continue, the claims against the wallet product will not be a part of the ongoing litigation
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
lex anastasia
@lexanastasia
note that the SEC's argument for claiming that Coinbase operated as an unregistered broker through its wallet product was that (1) Coinbase charged a 1% commission fee for its services 💸 and (2) it "routed customer orders" to third-party providers
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
lex anastasia
@lexanastasia
however, it failed to allege that Coinbase engaged in common broker activities, such as holding customer funds or negotiating terms for the transactions
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
lex anastasia
@lexanastasia
now, here are highlights of the analysis that led to the decision to dismiss the wallet-related claim ✨ #1 ⬩there is no suggestion that the "wallet undertakes routing activities in a manner recognized by courts to have been traditionally carried out by brokers... such as directing how trades should be executed"
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
lex anastasia
@lexanastasia
#2⬩the wallet is SELF-CUSTODIAL 🔒 Coinbase does not have control over user assets or transactions and end users are the sole decision-makers when it comes to transactions
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction