Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
“Under Antitrust laws, you become a criminal the moment you go into business. If you charge too much, you can be prosecuted for monopoly. If you charge too low, it’s unfair competition. If you charge the same prices as your competitors, you can be prosecuted for collusion” What’s y’all’s take on this take?
6 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Leo
@leosn.eth
Nah this ain’t a good take These things are bad if and only if you can convince court that these pricing decisions are related to market power In essence, if you have too much market power, antitrust should be able to get to you no matter what your prices are As it should be
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
So while ultimately I agree with you I’d push back on the characterization slightly - regulators (unelected one’s btw) don’t have to convince a court of truth in order to materially damage or hinder your org. They just have to threaten or charge and you’re locked up in a multi year public swamp trial
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Leo
@leosn.eth
Yeah fair in theory Are there many actual examples of a govt agency swamping a private company in cases? Even so, they should usually have good reason to act, because they should be accountable to parliament/Congress
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Leo
@leosn.eth
French authorities raided Nvidia’s offices recently, which is an example of your point But I doubt this happens to small companies who would really get swamped
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Cameron Armstrong
@cameron
I’d have to check the timelines but FAANG over the past 15 years has basically been consistently threatened by the FTC (not that I’m worried about them) - probably the best example of swamp is failed mergers (like visa plaid) that are extrajudicial threats without any opportunity cost from the ftc?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
