Engineering

One of the innovations we're using @vaporware is a new alternative to S-expressions, called Rex. I'm super excited for Lisp devs to check it out. 

Rex has a very simple parser and supports macro's like Lisp, but is much more readable imo. Lots of layouts too

Digital membranes - Nock heresy
https://vaporware.network

One of the innovations we're using @vaporware is a new alternative to S-expressions, called Rex. I'm super excited for Lisp devs to check it out. 

Rex has a very simple parser and supports macro's like Lisp, but is much more readable imo. Lots of layouts too

https://git.sr.ht/~plan/plunder/tree/master/item/doc/REX.md

This is pretty interesting. How linked to Urbit is @vaporware? Or not at all, beyond just sharing some ideas?

On Rex itself I’d be curious to see some examples for macros, or rather any larger expression with sub expressions that are evaluated and others that aren’t. S-exps can get pretty hairy and I’m mostly curious what R-exps would look like!

This is the "col" macro (used when the last arg is a callback lambda). e.g.
  : (x y z) < foo x y
  | add x
  | add y z

Expands to:
- foo x y
& (x y z)
| add x
| add y z

Where `-` and `|` are function application.

Definition starts at line 112: https://git.sr.ht/~plan/plunder/tree/master/item/sire/sire_17_sug.sire