While Optimism makes use of Optimistic Rollups, Polygon uses a combination of sidechains, Plasma, and PoS to accomplish scalability. As a result, Polygon is able to handle more transactions per second than Optimism, but its transactions are also less secure than Optimism's.

Optimism's utilization of Optimistic Rollups focuses on enhancing transaction speed while maintaining high security standards.
🎭

Polygon's hybrid model of sidechains, Plasma, and PoS provides flexibility in scalability, catering to diverse transactional needs
🎭

Optimism's approach with Optimistic Rollups emphasizes security-first solutions, prioritizing the integrity and safety of transactions
🎭

Optimism network can handle more features i think.
🎭

the combination of fast L2 and high security was in the Optimism network.
🎭

with Optimism network your will not be worried and stressful.
🎭