Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

LLC LLC ( šŸŽ© , ā˜®ļø )  pfp
LLC LLC ( šŸŽ© , ā˜®ļø )
@legalmastermind
1/ Early Winds Phenomenon: There is a unique situation that I've seen occur, a few times now particularly with the DMT-NAT mints that are hosted on either Luminex/Unisat, where when you are among the first to mint a highly anticipated drop you may in fact could be less likely to be the first to inscribe. šŸ§µšŸ‘‡
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions

LLC LLC ( šŸŽ© , ā˜®ļø )  pfp
LLC LLC ( šŸŽ© , ā˜®ļø )
@legalmastermind
2/ Though there is an exception, if you are lucky and the block clears as soon as you send at whatever competent s/vb value then by the grace of the mempool you are marked safe. If you are looking to inscribe another batch then as you know, another block, another array of circumstances.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

LLC LLC ( šŸŽ© , ā˜®ļø )  pfp
LLC LLC ( šŸŽ© , ā˜®ļø )
@legalmastermind
3/ Now, on the other hand, a perplexing issue arises on the block(s) a highly anticipated mint of such likes goes live, for instance, note the remaining inscriptions and live timestamp on Luminex, note the s/vb values on mempool. space.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

LLC LLC ( šŸŽ© , ā˜®ļø )  pfp
LLC LLC ( šŸŽ© , ā˜®ļø )
@legalmastermind
4/ What's different about this block? The former ones in the mempool have gone through in a span of 8-12 minutes yet this one in particular with the anticipated drop live is taking 25-35 minutes. How can this be a problem for those who got an early wind with no block that luckily insta-sent after sending to inscribe?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

LLC LLC ( šŸŽ© , ā˜®ļø )  pfp
LLC LLC ( šŸŽ© , ā˜®ļø )
@legalmastermind
5/ At the beginning of the block when you were looking to inscribe a batch lets say s/vb values were 27 and 29 respectively for medium and high prio; throughout the span of that congested block the competent s/vb value for you not to get front run could double to quadruple.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction