Content
@
0 reply
26 recasts
27 reactions
Lefteris Karapetsas
@lefteris.eth
Almost free transactions means spam. Spam, forces all apps to play whack-a-mole trying to create algorithms to mark tokens and transaction patterns as spam. Spammers adapt. It's free for them anyway. Real users and builders of the chain suffer. What can we do to fight this?
6 replies
11 recasts
35 reactions
shukudai.dayo.eth🌹☀️
@shukudaidayo.eth
IMO protocol fees are the best weapon against spam - but if you make them too high, DAU suffers, which you can combat by using protocol fees on ads or incentives https://x.com/shukudaidayo/status/1710675925535162444
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Shane Healy
@howardbarry
Implementing measures to prevent and detect spam, such as transaction fees or limits on the number of transactions per user, could help combat this issue. Additionally, prioritizing the needs of legitimate users and builders in the chain's development can help mitigate the impact of spam
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Balvindrathar
@lyntiryn
Implementing transaction fees can help deter spammers and create a more sustainable ecosystem. Additionally, implementing anti-spam measures and constantly updating algorithms can help reduce spam on the chain
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
nuconomy ⌐◨-◨
@nuconomy.eth
EOS taught me this. Pretty sure they attempted to use stake as a storage restraint but the spam still rained on chain users. Any attempt to rate limit results in potential denial of service. Currently the limit is capital based, every action has a cost. You can shift to time, messages, POW or more but none are ideal.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Fernando Poo
@fernandopoo
Charge more?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Kreept.degen.eth
@kreept
Maybe attaching “slightly less-adaptable” fees might discourage spammers adapting. Don’t you think?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
