Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

cody pfp
cody
@codyb.eth
Has anyone in crypto world attempted to make a (better) alternative to Wikipedia? Given the editorial tilt of Wikipedia, this seems like such a big, meaningful project to take on. It's one that's also super difficult. Would require $ and a better plan on how to organize and sustain the editorial.
9 replies
0 recast
25 reactions

Jacob pfp
Jacob
@jrf
what's the biggest issue with wikipedia? i presume it could be forked and re-edited but how would that make it better?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Marcela pfp
Marcela
@laursa.eth
it’s too easy to edit and AI doesn’t even look for it. I could edit argentinian players pages right now calling them racists and we’d need to wait until someone else saw it and fixed, which wouldn’t prevent me from editing again. i wouldn’t be wrong though. but whatever this wasn’t the point
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jacob pfp
Jacob
@jrf
lol yeah, it's a tricky problem it seems that what matters more is the website that people trust, and not so much what it says
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Marcela pfp
Marcela
@laursa.eth
yes, but mostly, people where k live think some important entity built wikipedia!! not that its edited by users 😂
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jacob pfp
Jacob
@jrf
yep, do you think that's better or worse than asking chatgpt?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Marcela pfp
Marcela
@laursa.eth
i’d say it’s mostly worse. but because there’s no control, at least i know gpt won’t mock me
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction