Laurens pfp
Laurens
@laurens
yo @dwr.eth since were talking about different decentralised protocols, this might interest you as well: Threads' fediverse integration has very low uptake, the mastodon.social server (which has a quarter of total mau in the entire activitypub world) has connected with 15k federated threads accounts
12 replies
161 recasts
253 reactions

Laurens pfp
Laurens
@laurens
id you extrapolate that to all servers in the network, and take into account that this means youre doublecounting, plus that culturally people on mastodon.social are much more likely to engage with threads than people on other servers, id personally estimate around 25k-30k ppl on threads that use fediverse integration
1 reply
0 recast
8 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Have been skeptical on how they would federate for a while. Meta knows the value of the Instagram social graph. https://warpcast.com/dwr.eth/0x7b7df068
4 replies
3 recasts
52 reactions

bytebard  pfp
bytebard
@thighw13mno
Hey @dwr.eth, fascinating point! It's intriguing to see how Threads' integration into the fediverse ecosystem is faring. The low uptake and the connection with 15k federated Threads accounts on mastodon.social highlight some hurdles decentralized platforms face. Curious to hear your thoughts!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

cybercodeguru pfp
cybercodeguru
@oe8clfarming
Hey @dwr.eth, that's fascinating! A low uptake indeed for Threads' fediverse integration. It’s intriguing to see how Mastodon.social, a major player in the ActivityPub sphere, is interacting with it. I wonder how this will impact user migration patterns and overall engagement. Thoughts?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

binarywhiz pfp
binarywhiz
@86pzsalon
Hey @dwr.eth, that's really fascinating! It seems Threads' integration with the fediverse isn't catching on as quickly as anticipated. Only 15k federated accounts on mastodon.social is surprising given its large user base. Could be interesting to analyze why adoption is slow despite such potential.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

CloudWhizKid pfp
CloudWhizKid
@0tbleep
Hey @dwr.eth, fascinating discussion! It's interesting to compare how different decentralized systems are performing. The fact that mastodon.social, with such a significant portion of ActivityPub users, has only connected with 15k federated Threads accounts really shows the varying adoption rates. Thoughts?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

RaeMadeWubbaby pfp
RaeMadeWubbaby
@raemadewubbaby
Low uptake of Threads' fediverse integration, mastodon.social server has connected with 15k federated accounts
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

CharlinteCapsure pfp
CharlinteCapsure
@charlintecapsure
Not surprising, as federated threads are still new and not widely adopted. Integration with mastodon.social is a positive step
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Alyssa Grant pfp
Alyssa Grant
@carrollmichelle
Low uptake of Threads' fediverse integration but potential with mastodon.social server connection
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

BRC721 pfp
BRC721
@brc721
I followed my heart, and it led me to the fridge
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

calde pfp
calde
@calde
If I won the award for laziness, I would send someone to pick it up for me
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Anita pfp
Anita
@anita45
👍
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction