Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Laura Shin pfp
Laura Shin
@laurashin
I know certain factions in the Biden administration have made it seem like crypto is a political issue. But a lot of Dems are pro-crypto and have crossed party lines multiple times (including just this week!) to express their support for crypto.
6 replies
3 recasts
35 reactions

Laura Shin pfp
Laura Shin
@laurashin
IMO, it’s not a good idea for the industry to only support one side. If that side doesn’t win, things could get even worse for crypto.
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

Laura Shin pfp
Laura Shin
@laurashin
It seems the better strategy is to not stoop to the level of those who would make it a political issue but instead court politicians on both sides of the aisle so you have supporters no matter which side is in power. My 🪙🪙
0 reply
0 recast
8 reactions

Laura Shin pfp
Laura Shin
@laurashin
As an example, here’s an interview I did with Democrat Ritchie Torres, who is pro-crypto: https://youtu.be/7ocDx7zI0uc?si=MVuSz6Me8Iv_CLcJ
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

Viz pfp
Viz
@vizualobserver
thanks, laura! easy to fall into tribalism (v much incl myself); always good to remember that crypto has the potential to be a net good compatible w any point & regardless of where you fall on the pol spectrum
0 reply
0 recast
3 reactions

Sean Wince 🎩 pfp
Sean Wince 🎩
@seanwince
The better indicator for whether a politician is pro or anti-crypto is not party affiliation, but instead how much campaign contributions have they taken from banks and tradfi? It just so happens that banks contribute more to Democrats overall, but not all of them
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

parseb pfp
parseb
@parseb.eth
Laura, I am sure you understand this point, but I will say it anyway: Crypto has always been political. Starting in the 90s. to present day when UK and Australian politicians are still trying to mandate backdoors. Appealing to reason has not worked. Rolling over and taking the abuse silently will not either.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction