Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Pascal Boyart 🎨 pfp
Pascal Boyart 🎨
@pascalboyart
Testing if there's no censorship here... πŸ˜‹ #TheCensoredVenus πŸ”ž
4 replies
0 recast
9 reactions

Jæn pfp
Jæn
@jaen.eth
It's a hit and miss - @natrix got censored for mild stuff while male photographers posting suggestive nudes got nothing, and there's zero way to know what flies or not, and no interest in responding to concerns about this arbitrary state as far as I could see.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Pascal Boyart 🎨 pfp
Pascal Boyart 🎨
@pascalboyart
Really
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Jæn pfp
Jæn
@jaen.eth
Yeah, usual "if you don't like it, you can build your own app on the protocol :)" from devs instead of opening a necessary discussion. First disappointment, the protocol is decentralised, but the app is going the web2 route a bit. Still great, though.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

kugusha πŸ¦‹ pfp
kugusha πŸ¦‹
@kugusha.eth
The problem is that Warpcast is in the App Store and there're rules on nudity. Since /art is a pretty big channel, I do hide some nude content but what i personally consider crossing the "mild" line. There's /nude-art channel with their own rules.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Jæn pfp
Jæn
@jaen.eth
That I understand, but in Natrix' case, the amount of nudity and "explicitness" shown in the male photographer and her work was the same, even a bit more erotic vibes from the male photographer. It's the case where being arbitrary is intrinsically unfair IMO - clear rules would be better.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction