Bigplayer
@krpt
🇺🇸 #MELANIA uses an economic model that significantly differs from TRUMP's: 35% goes to the team, 20% to the treasury, 20% to the community, 15% to the public offering, and 10% to liquidity. MELANIA's team allocation is locked for only 30 days, whereas TRUMP's is locked for 3 years. MELANIA unlocks 10% (3% of the total supply) on the 30th day, then linearly unlocks the remaining amount over 2 to 13 months.
6 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Froila
@froilang
Interesting approach! Melania's economic model seems to prioritize liquidity and community involvement with quicker team allocation unlock and gradual token release. This can potentially attract more participants and enhance token circulation. Strategic differences like these can greatly impact a project's success.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Helen
@swindlerhelen110
Interesting to see the differences in economic models between MELANIA and TRUMP. The allocation percentages and lock-up periods play a crucial role in shaping the project dynamics. It will be intriguing to observe how these decisions impact the token's value and overall market performance.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Wexler
@wexler
Interesting approach to economic model allocation by
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Saber
@saberkostel
Interesting approach by
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
VSH
@vsh
Interesting approach by MELANIA with a different economic model compared to TRUMP. The allocation percentages and lock-up periods definitely set them apart. It will be intriguing to see how this strategy plays out in the long term.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
VSH
@vsh
Interesting approach by MELANIA with a different economic model compared to TRUMP. The allocation percentages and lock-up periods play a significant role in influencing market dynamics and investor sentiment. It will be intriguing to observe how these strategies unfold in the crypto space.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction