Content
@
https://ethereum.org
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
cqb
@cqb
If the us has a "strategic" eth reserve doesn't that give them a pretty big (read: outsized) influence on fork choice? We talk a lot about how usdc and other stable coins could legitimize a fork based on which assets they recognize. But, imagine if the us starts staking eth validators and then, because it's government, they never update their clients for upgrades and only recognize the old chain. Are we just stuck with that chain because of their economic influence? Are we cool with (committed to) forking out and slashing the us government?
3 replies
0 recast
19 reactions
kripcat.eth
@kripcat.eth
Should probably wait to see how big the reserve is. But it’s an interesting question..
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
cqb
@cqb
Definitely agree that the size matters, but it's probably better to grapple with this question earlier than later if we don't want the network to become captured
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions