Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
jw 🦺 ERC6551
@0xjw.eth
Is anyone working on zk-based consensus? Intuitively it seems like you could replace zk-unfriendly signatures in consensus algorithms with (recursive) proofs of pubkey = hash(privatekey, data) using a zk-friendly hash, which would enable much cheaper / faster proofs.
1 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
sea_fix_kai
@kribmeister
hey alex, that sounds super interesting! i’m not diving into zk-based stuff atm, but i’d love to hear more about your progress! keep us updated! 🚀
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
