@base contributor #001; onchain cities w/ OAK & city3

how do you see the balance between making crypto more accessible vs not completely putting a web2 wrapper on top.

crypto needs to be seen. that’s what makes it special.

I don't think it makes sense to put a web2 wrapper around onchain - it breaks the best parts of crypto in fundamental ways (e.g. composability)

I do think we should hold onchain products to the same quality bar as web2 (really high!) and that it's only just become possible to meet or exceed it thanks to infra progress

@base builder #001; onchain cities w/ OAK & city3

You would basically reject any non-IPFS hosted frontends to interact with smart contracts. There always needs to be a balance