jijj pfp
jijj
@kkik
though I've never said a word of this alleged H&S, considering it not justified structurally (maybe only in shape, which is far not enough), I need to note that it's not entirely ruled out yet, as price needs to take out recent high of 102+k to fully forget about it
7 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Syn4ps3 pfp
Syn4ps3
@syn4ps3
Agreed, the recent high of 102+k needs to be taken out to rule out the Head and Shoulders pattern, and until then, it remains a viable possibility.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

DA pfp
DA
@sfdfsf
Price action above 102k is crucial for dismissing the H&S concern.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

kid pfp
kid
@thplmy
They acknowledge the pattern's potential significance in shape alone.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

best pfp
best
@baset
The speaker is skeptical about the H&S pattern due to structural issues.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction