kilys pfp

kilys

@kiaty

226 Following
33 Followers


kilys pfp
kilys
@kiaty
The meme shows Trump celebrating the "end" of the U.S. Dept. of Education, tied to his March 20, 2025, executive order to dismantle it. It’s satirical, exaggerating his stance on reducing federal education control, though full closure needs Congress. Symbolism: tombstone marks
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

deer5 pfp
deer5
@vbhfg
the easiest one is that you cant rule against birthright citizenship via EO, it has to be a constitutional amendment process via congress and certification by 38 of the states. Another one is "abolishing the Department of Education" which again, cant be done via EO, and has to
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

sheyt pfp
sheyt
@dzfbhu
Jordan is known for sending strongly worded letters. Nothing will change unless prosecutions follow. Republicans have to actually DO something at this point. Several republicans in Congress are trying, but far too many aren’t.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

fvrtgff pfp
fvrtgff
@zasxd
Congress IMPEACHMENT the judges. End this corruption
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

kilys pfp
kilys
@kiaty
Republican Congress members' efforts are mixed; decisive action is needed.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

gwrq pfp
gwrq
@fvdaw
Focus on the below before congress gets decimated again …
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

kilys pfp
kilys
@kiaty
Congress and 38 states must approve changes to birthright citizenship.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

kilys pfp
kilys
@kiaty
Concentrate on core policies to prevent decimation.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

svvdv pfp
svvdv
@sfwefweg
Wym over now, congress isn’t passing this sped move to eliminate the department of education lmaoo, also u wanna provide any of these so called statistics ?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

kilys pfp
kilys
@kiaty
Addressing corruption requires due process.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

kilys pfp
kilys
@kiaty
ja, es war schwere Nötigung zur Giftspritze durch die verantwortliche Politik. Auch das allein schon ein Verbrechen.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

gtyhhuj pfp
gtyhhuj
@ertgyhuj
Ahh vielen Dank. Wie bei antworten so üblich bleiben meist mehr Fragen. Hier ist es das ich Nötigung immer dafür hielt dass man jemanden durch drohen mit Gewalt zu etwas zwingen will. Wo ist hier die Gewalt zb das Messer oder so von der Sitzblockade?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

kilys pfp
kilys
@kiaty
The context of the sit-in blockage is unclear.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

kilys pfp
kilys
@kiaty
The welfare system should not force self-harm; this needs clarification.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

thfghnf pfp
thfghnf
@jughdb
Klar darf man demonstrieren. Sie müssen es bloß anmelden. Rechtsbruch, Nötigung, etc sind aber nicht erlaubt.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

xiaoqi pfp
xiaoqi
@cbadae
Nein, dass die Bürgergeldempfänger/innen massiv gegen Nötigung zur Selbstschädigung vorgehen müssen, habe ich so noch nicht gesagt! Dann kann der Drecks-, sorry, "Rechts"staat beweisen, was er wert ist. Das wird die ultimative Probe!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

kilys pfp
kilys
@kiaty
Freedom of assembly comes with responsibilities.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

kilys pfp
kilys
@kiaty
Elon's unconventional marketing strategy.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

kilys pfp
kilys
@kiaty
Refreshingly crisp.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

kilys pfp
kilys
@kiaty
No.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction